Player Handbook 2 doubts

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

ishan_wh

Jan 13, 2008 10:26:24
Hey everybody, I wanted to know if the spells, feats, and alternate class features of the PHB2 can be added to the DSC3 rules.

Like the fighters elusive attack abilitie instead of the feat, or the spell like kelgoreĀ“s firebolt are ok in DSC3

???

Well let me know,

Any feedback is always welcomed
#2

flip

Jan 13, 2008 13:04:47
Hey everybody, I wanted to know if the spells, feats, and alternate class features of the PHB2 can be added to the DSC3 rules.

Like the fighters elusive attack abilitie instead of the feat, or the spell like kelgoreĀ“s firebolt are ok in DSC3

???

Well let me know,

Any feedback is always welcomed

You're always welcome to include them in your own game.

As for the core rules, we have the policy that we will not introduce dependancies beyond the core rulebooks and the XPH. This might be expandable to include what's in the SRD (a large part of the optional rules from Unearthed Arcana, a few of which I really like, is in the SRD).

We can, and occasionally (but not nearly often enough) release "guidelines" on incorporating material from optional rulebooks into a Dark Sun campaign, but we're not going to tie anything official to those rulebooks. Basically, it's about not forcing people to buy books in order to use a free download.
#3

Zardnaar

Jan 14, 2008 12:19:21
PHB2 is very sexy though.
#4

lhurgyof

Jan 20, 2008 15:05:50
Well, I would say that most of the classes are a no. One would ask himself "What would this be doing on Athas?". But some instances, A Dray Dragon shaman of Dregoth, for instance, should be permitable. But it is your game, do with it as you wish.
#5

Zardnaar

Jan 20, 2008 21:56:20
I thought the Beguiler would also make sense for Darksun as well.